Physical Product · 2012
Personal Electronic Response Systems (PERS)
A way to personalize electronic response systems for individuals who feel stigmatized by designs that unintentionally make them feel old, unattractive, or dependent, to improve user confidence and adoption rates.

- Stanford University | Stanford, CA | 2012-2014
Problem
Personal electronic response systems, emergency call devices, work, but they often go unworn. Their designs can feel stigmatizing, unintentionally making users feel old, unattractive, or dependent, which undermines confidence and adoption.
“Personal electronic response systems have utility and functionality, but they are totally ineffectual if people don’t want to use them.”
David Jaffe, ME, Instructor, Perspectives in Assistive Technology, Stanford University
Solution
Research & Discovery
While I was a graduate student at Stanford, my grandmother was living alone, 3,000 miles away in Florida. When I asked why she didn’t use her emergency call device, she replied, “I’d rather wear jewelry around my neck than an ugly plastic call button.” That comment stayed with me.
Curious whether others felt the same, I began volunteering at Lytton Gardens, an assisted living community in Palo Alto. There, I learned that many older adults shared my grandmother’s resistance, not to the function of emergency call devices, but to their aesthetics and the stigma they carried.
Design & Testing
In response, I focused my graduate work on the women’s market, reimagining emergency call devices to be more appealing, wearable like fashion jewelry or a Swatch® watch, so they aligned with users’ identities. The project emphasized user preference, accessibility, and customization as core drivers of usability.
Final Product
Unique PERS accessories and “after-market” personalization options, pendants, bracelets, and rings that read as jewelry rather than medical devices, based on feedback from older adults.
Outcome
Concept work, not carried to manufacture. What it established is that older adults were not rejecting the function of an emergency call device, they were rejecting the object. Once the device read as jewelry rather than as equipment, the objection went away. Designing for dignity rather than for compliance is a principle I have carried into everything worn on the body since.










